Home > Errors / Fixes > Network Benchmark
Execu/Tech Systems is not responsible for your network and computer hardware. If you're experiencing network or computer hardware related problems, we provide this benchmark tool for your network technician, but we can't fix these problems for you.
This is an unsupported FREE utility. Our technicians can't help you with it and the only information available for this utility is on this page.
If you're receiving a poor benchmark score, make sure that your antivirus is properly configured. Recommended firewall configuration can be found here: System Requirements
Look at the bottom of this page for information on how to read the benchmark results.
Because it's often difficult for technicians to determine whether or not your network is adequate to run our software, we provide a benchmark application that provides a score and lets you know what you can expect.
Make sure you're always running the latest version of the ETBenchmark.exe.
There are 2 ways to run ETBenchmark:
From the Hotel Folder
From the Execu/Tech Application
Perform the Tests
​
Understanding your score
ETBenchmark Log file
Score Range
A low score can be caused by many things. Based on our experience and feedback from our customers over more than 25 years, these are the most common causes:
Low scores can be a symptom of a problem that has the potential to corrupt your data and lead to critical and unrecoverable data loss.
It's your on-site network professional's responsibility to determine the actual cause of the problem and to find a solution.
Remote Desktop Services
Always be sure you're running the latest version. Download ETBenchmark.exe
After ETBenchmark runs, Notebad will open with the last run results. This tells you how to read those results.
ETBenchmark measures the type of repeated file access used by Execu/Tech applications. It is not a general internet speed test and should not be compared directly with ping, iPerf, or a large file copy. A network may show excellent bandwidth while still having poor small-file, file-locking, or SMB response times.
The examples below use anonymous computer names, server names, user names, addresses, and hardware information.
Each result is followed by a plain-language explanation. Use the measurements together rather than relying on any single value.
============================================================ ETBenchmark v.2026.7.13.2 ============================================================ BENCHMARK SESSION ------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Started: July 13, 2026 12:19:35 PM Benchmark Stopped: July 13, 2026 12:20:58 PM Records Tested: 5000 Run From Folder: \\FILESERVER\Application BENCHMARK RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------ Score: 366 Score Comment: This is an above average score. The software should be usable with few delays. Avg Read Time (ms): 10.14 Max Read Time (ms): 127.6 Avg Write Time (ms): 6.16 Max Write Time (ms): 99.27 Delays: 0 Maximum ETBenchmark Process I/O Rate (Mbps): 342.44 NETWORK INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------ Resolved Path: \\FILESERVER\Application Network Server: FILESERVER Server Address: 192.168.10.20 Local IP Address: 192.168.10.45 Connection Type: Wired Ethernet Network Adapter: Ethernet Adapter Adapter Name: Ethernet Adapter Status: Up Link Speed: 1 Gbps Network Interface: Ethernet MAC Address: 00-11-22-33-44-55 Interface Index: 11 DHCP Enabled: True Default Gateway: 192.168.10.1 DNS Servers: 192.168.10.20, 192.168.10.21 COMPUTER INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------ Windows User: USER Computer Name: WORKSTATION01 Windows Version: Microsoft Windows 11 Pro Screen Resolution: 1920 X 1080 CPU: Example Processor 2.40GHz 2400 Mhz, Total RAM: 31.8GB Available Ram: 14.4GB CPU Usage: 34.8 % * * * Additional Network and File Diagnostics * * * Diagnostic Path: \\FILESERVER\Application Resolved Path: \\FILESERVER\Application Path Type: Network Network Server: FILESERVER Server Address: 192.168.10.20 DNS Lookup Time: 0.433 ms Ping Samples Sent: 25 Ping Samples Received: 25 Ping Samples Lost: 0 Ping Packet Loss: 0% Ping Samples: 25 Ping Minimum: 4 ms Ping Average: 5.68 ms Ping Maximum: 31 ms Ping P50: 5 ms Ping P95: 5 ms Ping P99: 31 ms SMB Port 445: Available SMB Connection Samples: 5 SMB Connection Minimum: 5.49 ms SMB Connection Average: 6.393 ms SMB Connection Maximum: 7.695 ms SMB Connection P50: 5.821 ms SMB Connection P95: 7.695 ms SMB Connection P99: 7.695 ms File Create Samples: 25 File Create Minimum: 3.9 ms File Create Average: 4.625 ms File Create Maximum: 5.821 ms File Create P50: 4.503 ms File Create P95: 5.634 ms File Create P99: 5.821 ms File Open Samples: 25 File Open Minimum: 1.004 ms File Open Average: 1.317 ms File Open Maximum: 1.926 ms File Open P50: 1.283 ms File Open P95: 1.736 ms File Open P99: 1.926 ms File Close Samples: 25 File Close Minimum: 0.021 ms File Close Average: 0.029 ms File Close Maximum: 0.055 ms File Close P50: 0.024 ms File Close P95: 0.05 ms File Close P99: 0.055 ms File Rename Samples: 25 File Rename Minimum: 6.578 ms File Rename Average: 7.717 ms File Rename Maximum: 10.757 ms File Rename P50: 7.654 ms File Rename P95: 9.773 ms File Rename P99: 10.757 ms File Delete Samples: 25 File Delete Minimum: 2.633 ms File Delete Average: 3.231 ms File Delete Maximum: 3.851 ms File Delete P50: 3.197 ms File Delete P95: 3.798 ms File Delete P99: 3.851 ms ============================================================ END OF ETBENCHMARK RESULTS ============================================================
A successful ping or iPerf test does not prove that Windows file access is performing correctly. Ping measures small-packet round-trip latency. iPerf measures large-block network throughput. ETBenchmark measures repeated SMB and file operations that more closely resemble the workload used by Execu/Tech applications.
When troubleshooting, compare the affected workstation with a known-good workstation using the same server, share, switch, application folder, and benchmark version. The most useful signs of a problem are packet loss, high maximum values, large differences between P50 and P95/P99, repeated delays, and file-operation times that are much worse on one workstation than another.
Cobol File Errors Slow / Stuck Software Rebuild Corrupted File Common System Issues